Proclamation on Unethical Leadership

 

Case 02-2015: Myanmar

 

Proclamation on Unethical Leadership

September 18, 2017

The International Buddhist Ethics Committee & Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights,

Whereas on May 1, 2015, Myanmar’s military Government led by Thein Sein was sentenced by the Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights for the serious charges of Genocide, Ethnic Cleansing and Crimes against Humanity;

Recalling that on May 16, 2015, the Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights has notified Southeast Asian countries such as Bangladesh and Malaysia that the Rohingya People persecuted by Myanmar are fleeing from a Genocide and they therefore should be considered as refugees and never as illegal immigrants;

Aware that Thein Sein, in order to seek impunity, after leaving the political Power decided to order himself spiritually within the Buddhist Commune (Sangha), a fact that has been banned by the Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights because the Buddhist Law does not allow the entrance of murderers;

Deeply concerned about the lives of millions of people of the Rohingya People, mostly children and women, who are being exterminated in Myanmar under the leadership of the new de facto President Aung San Suu Kyi, so that the Norwegian Nobel Committee was ordered to cancel her Nobel Peace Prize;

Deploring the criminal and genocidal behavior of Aung San Suu Kyi, who has betrayed all the ethical and humanitarian values that every Buddhist and Nobel Peace Prize winner should represent;

Analyzing that Myanmar’s civic-military dictatorship has not only murdered dozens of Buddhist Bhikkhus but has also infiltrated within the Spiritual Commune (Sangha) through the false monk Ashin Wirathu and his criminal organizations, which have greatly tarnished the humanitarian image of Buddhism at the global level through supporting violence, apartheid and genocide, all of which is a behavior in violation of the Buddhist Law and Human Rights;

Taking into consideration that global journalism constantly claims that the ethnic cleansing carried out against the Rohingya People has the support of the Myanmar Buddhist monks, ignoring the fact that the International Buddhist Ethics Committee declared as False Buddhism to both Ashin Wirathu and the criminal organization State Sangha Maha Nayaka Committee;

Examining that the defense of the lives of millions of Rohingya People has ethically forced the Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights to denounce organizations that directly or indirectly endorse these crimes against humanity, as is the case with the organizations called Movement 969, Ma Ba Tha, International Buddhist Confederation, World Alliance of Buddhist Leaders and World Peace Prize Awarding Council;

Bearing in mind that if Siddhartha Gautama existed in the contemporary world he would prefer the destruction of Buddhism rather than the existence of a Buddhism perverted through violence and genocide, since the great Buddhas of history have always transmitted a Path of Love and Peace, never making omissive silence before Hatred and War;

Affirming that despite being judged for genocide by the Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights, even the leaders of Iran and Indonesia agree that the Myanmar government is committing violent activities and that this great humanitarian crisis must end immediately;

Being appalled at the fact that the UN – which is another government condemned for genocide by the Buddhist Tribunal – criticizes the ethnic cleansing carried out by de the facto President Aung San Suu Kyi, making this criticism superficially because Myanmar government has never been held accountable to the International Justice, which shows the total inoperability of the UN in order to be able to ethically lead the world and defend human rights;

Reaffirming that the discriminatory and genocidal treatment that Myanmar’s civic-military dictatorship is providing to the Rohingya People is a violation of Buddhist Law as well as a violation of the Supreme Human Right to Peace;

  • Absolute solidarity is expressed with the Rohingya People, who are considered as brothers of the Buddhic People.
  • It is stated that the Myanmar government led by the de facto President Aung San Suu Kyi is in breach of international laws, developing a systematic and widespread plan of genocide, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity, which constitute High Crimes Against Peace.
  • It is confirmed that, for purely economic reasons, the Chinese government is supporting the criminal government of Myanmar.
  • It is stated that the members of the Rohingya People possess an intrinsic Freedom and Dignity that all States and international organizations must respect and maintain.
  • It is claimed that the death of one single child or member of the Rohingya People constitutes the death of all humanity, for all sentient beings are interconnected and conform a sacred unity in the great fabric of life.
  • The association between Buddhism and violence is condemned as false, being a childish journalistic view that misinterprets the historical and cultural Truth, violating the sacredness of the Buddhist Spirituality by means of the dissemination of illusory stereotypes.
  • It is confirmed that violence and war are ineffective instruments to resolve any kind of conflict, only worsening the true causes of problems.
  • It is established that Buddhism always was and will be on the side of the poor and oppressed ones, always seeking the Cure of their suffering.
  • This Ethical Proclamation is invoked as an act of justice against the violations of Buddhist Law and the Human Rights carried out by the State of Myanmar and the UN.
  • It is rejected the fact that international journalism writes hundreds of articles stating that Myanmar Genocide is supported by Buddhism, constantly ignoring that the Buddhist Tribunal is the first organization in precisely denouncing and judging this crime against humanity;
  • It is recalled the teachings of Siddharta Gautama and the Maitriyana Spirituality, whose compassionate wisdom has the ability to save humankind through a supreme ethical leadership.

This was written two thousand six hundred years after the founding and independence of the Great Buddhist Nation.

President: H.E. Master Maitreya Samyaksambuddha

Legal Opinion on Aung San Suu Kyi

Legal Opinion on Case 02-2015: Myanmar

Monday 23 January 2017

Due to the continuing genocidal persecution of the Rohingya People by the Myanmar army, which continues to carry out ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity against this group, it will then be determined whether the facts submited constitute an act of Complicity on the part of the the new government of Myanmar, which is currently led by Minister Aung San Suu Kyi, Nobel Peace Prize.

 

Description of the Case

At the beginning of 2015, when the International Buddhist Ethics Committee & Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights was created in the first two cases, it was not only analyzed and sentenced the false Buddhist monk Ashin Wirathu of Myanmar for Discrimination, Social Segregation and Apology of Violence, but also the military government of Myanmar presided over by Thein Sein had previously been sentenced with the charges of Genocide, Ethnic Cleansing and Crimes against humanity, being something that very few organizations worldwide dared to denounce at that moment. The Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights immediately communicated with the countries of the Southeast Asia region, such as Bangladesh, Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia, which were notified that the thousands of members of the Rohingya People arriving in their countries were not immigrants but refugees fleeing from genocide, reason by which they should be received and protected according to what is established in international human rights treaties. Although these countries began to receive the thousands of refugees, and even Malaysia agreed that it was about ethnic cleansing, the Rohingya People continued to be persecuted and massacred in Myanmar. After the change of government, former President Thein Sein sought impunity for his international crimes when attempting to become a Buddhist monk, something that was quickly declared as illegal in a historical Resolution of the Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights. At the same time, the Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights judged the Myanmar State Buddhist Committee for Genocide and Crimes against Humanity in another historical trial. However, with the change of government in Myanmar, the current Minister Aung San Suu Kyi not only did not initiate a trial against Thein Sein for human rights violations, but she allowed the army to continue and further aggravate the genocidal acts and crimes against humanity against the Rohingya People. With respect to the abovementioned complicity, the Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights proceeds to issue the following ethical legal opinion.

 

Preliminary Warning

The International Buddhist Ethics Committee & Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights evaluates violations of ethics and human rights, so that its legal framework is the Buddhist Tribal Law and International Law. These procedures are millennial and intrinsic to the system of self-government of the spiritual commune (sangha), although it has the innovation of the universal jurisdiction which allows the analysis of violations of other communities and countries.

 

Personal Backround of the Accused

In order to analyze in the present case the existence of an act of Complicity on the part of Aung San Suu Kyi, Nobel Peace Prize Laureate and current de Facto  President of Myanmar, it is fundamental to offer the antecedents of the accused. Although she was awarded with the Nobel Peace Prize about two decades ago, supposedly for promoting democracy, human rights and ethnic reconciliation by peaceful means, the fact is that Aung San Suu Kyi currently holds a de facto presidency in Myanmar which violates the principles of democracy, while covering-up and not criticizing the systematic and widespread violations of human rights carried out by the army with total impunity, thus endorsing genocide, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity against the Rohingya People. Her ambition to keep political power with the cost of impunity, making a spurious pact with Myanmar’s genocidal military forces by not denouncing the repression, persecution and extermination of ethnic minorities, is one of the greatest disappointments in the history of human rights and world peace. Myanmar’s army continues to persecute, torture, sexually abuse, illegally arrest, displacing, confiscating and murdering with impunity the ethnic minorities Kachin, Karen and Shan, even by burning babies. The silence and complicity of Aung San Suu Kyi in the face of the atrocities and genocide suffered by the Rohingya People has led to a dozen Nobel Peace Laureates protesting to the UN about this situation. In addition to have a duty to exercise political authority in Myanmar always in a way that is consistent with International Law, Aung San Suu Kyi should also exercise her ethical authority as a former Nobel Peace Prize laureate, which shows that this award no longer can continue to be synonymous with ethics, righteouness and defense of fundamental freedoms. However, twelve Nobel Peace Prize winners – along with the support of other international leaders – have tried to differentiate themselves from the illegal and genocidal actions of Aung San Suu Kyi, denouncing that in Myanmar there are crimes against humanity and there is also banning of humanitarian assistance to the victims, violating the human rights of the Rohingya People, so that the Nobel Peace Prize group called for an immediate halt to these ethnic cleansing crimes, and for Aung San Suu Kyi to rule with courage, humanity and compassion. Although this international ethical claim called for urgent UN intervention in Myanmar, this organization has omitted its responsibility to prevent and punish the crime of genocide. The twelve Nobel Peace Prize winners were Muhammad Yunus, Jose Ramos-Horta, Máiread Maguire, Betty Williams, Desmond Tutu, Oscar Arias, Jody Williams, Shirin Ebadi, Tawakkol Karman, Leymah Gbowee, Malala Yousafzai and Sir Richard J. Roberts.

 

Complicity with Violations of Human Rights

After describing the case together with the defendant’s background, the Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights is in a position to rule on Aung San Suu Kyi‘s Complicity with the massive and systematic violations of human rights in Myanmar, which are the more serious international crimes, such as Genocide, Ethnic cleansing and Crimes against humanity. In Myanmar there continue to be rape of women and mass murders, using the excuse of an alleged counterinsurgency campaign against “rohingyas militias” that do not exist, because in fact it hides a dark and malicious plan of ethnic cleansing, because these are attacks against unprotected civilians, many of whom are beheaded or burned alive. These atrocities not only include killings but also massive and systematic sexual violations against women and girls, using abuse as a weapon of war. In the face of this genocide, hundreds of thousands of Rohingya People have fled to other countries, where they almost have no food or medical treatment, and most are not allowed to enter. The current government continues to deny that these violations of human rights are occurring, further alleging that it is the Rohingya People who are destroying their own homes. Aung San Suu Kyi, who is the de Facto President of Myanmar, even defends the military that devastated her country and detained her for 15 years, who murdered dozens of Buddhist monks and denied the most basic human rights to hundreds of thousands of Rohingya People. Many UN officials have denounced that these facts are an ethnic cleansing, although the UN has never decided to investigate or bring those responsible before the international courts. At the same time, Aung San Suu Kyi has confirmed that she is defending the genocidal crimes committed by the Myanmar army, by refusing to interfere when denying that human rights violations are occurring. Aung San Suu Kyi has defended and covered up the illegal actions by Myanmar’s army, while she has also accused the international community of promoting riots and conflicts between Muslims and Buddhists. Aung San Suu Kyi has stated that she seeks to maintain control, peace and stability within Myanmar; although systematic and widespread massacres prove that she is seeking to maintain her political power at the cost of defending the extermination of a whole people. In this way, it is an international shame that someone who received a Nobel Peace Prize is leading genocide, legitimizing ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity through their complicit silence. Although the international community has been able to idolize Aung San Suu Kyi as a human rights icon, her present behavior and thirst for power has made her one of the worst criminals in the world, to whom her Nobel Prize should be removed urgently and whom should be brought before the international courts. Although the Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights does not have any political and economic power to sanction or stop the genocide led by Aung San Suu Kyi, it certainly has supreme ethical and spiritual power to accuse her of Complicity with ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity, declaring its Nobel Peace Prize null and illegal.

 

Conclusion

The Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights has the Purpose (Dharma) to defend liberty, equality and fraternity of all humanity, promoting the enjoyment of human rights and respect for the dharmic nature of all sentient beings. The Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights has found sufficient evidence to confirm a legal Opinion against Aung San Suu Kyi for “Complicity” with Genocide, Ethnic Cleansing and Crimes against Humanity. In accordance with international human rights treaties, the Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights guarantees the right to life, the right to peace, the right to justice and the right to health, all of which have been violated systematically and in a widespread way. These violations were committed both by the de facto presidents Thein Sein and Aung San Suu Kyi. The Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights concludes that the Rohingya People is not having access to physical, mental, social and spiritual health, this being totally caused by the illegal government of Myanmar.

Ergo, the Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights rules as follow:

  1. It is stated that Myanmar’s refusal to provide full and effective access to life, health, citizenship, labor and Justice constitute illegal conducts on the part of the country’s political and military Power.
  2. International courts are requested to investigate and prosecute Myanmar for crimes of Genocide, Ethnic Cleansing and Crimes against Humanity, in the same way as the Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights did in 2015.
  3. All neighbor countries of Myanmar, especially Bangladesh, Malaysia, Thailand and China, are required to receive and do not forcibly expel the thousands of refugees fleeing from the genocide in Myanmar, since such expulsion is a crime against humanity.
  4. The UN is required to stop covering up the government of Myanmar and to adequately stop the genocidal acts of said government.
  5. The Nobel Peace Prize awarded to Aung San Suu Kyi is declared illegal and the Norwegian Nobel Committee is given 5 days in order to respond if it accepts this international request to cancel the award.
  6. It is stated that the indifference to this Opinion on the part of the highest authorities of the UN as well as by the Norwegian Nobel Committee constitute an act of Complicity with the illegal and criminal actions that have been denounced.

Always with a reconciling spirit,

Master Maitreya

President of the International Buddhist Ethics Committee & Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights

Act on Rohingya People

Case 02/2015: Myanmar

ACT ON ROHINGYA PEOPLE

 

Dear government of Malaysia,

On December 16, 2016, we are communicating with you in order to perform an International Endorsement to the declaration of Malaysia and the Prime Minister Najib Razak about the ethnic cleansing that is happening in Myanmar against the Rohingya people. This International Endorsement is in accordance with the Judgment of Genocide, Ethnic Cleansing and Crimes against Humanity that the government of Myanmar received by our Tribunal on May 2015, time in which a Notification to the governments of Bangladesh, Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia was also performed in order to consider the Rohingya People as refugees and not as illegal immigrants, since they were fleeing from terrible violations of human rights.

Because apartheid, mass persecution and murder of the Rohingya People are crimes that violate international law, Myanmar should not allude to the principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of another State. Human rights violations are a global issue to all humankind, so the Malaysian government has the right and duty to report international crimes occurring in Myanmar, even if the UN fails to carry out this ethical mission. In this way, it is requested that the government of Malaysia brings those responsible for this ethnic cleansing that happens in Myanmar to justice, while, at the same time, it is requested that the asylum rights of these thousands of refugees whose are fleeing from hatred and death will be respected.

In conclusion, Aung San Suu Kyi, the Minister of Myanmar, who has won the Nobel Peace Prize, should begin once and for all to uphold the human rights of the Rohingya People, since she has never done it before. Otherwise, Aung San Suu Kyi should return her Nobel Peace Prize and assume that she has broken the mission of bringing Kindness and Harmony to the world.

 

Always with spirit of Reconciliation (Maitri),

Master Maitreya

President of Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights

Notification on Southeast Asian Region

Case 02/2015: Myanmar

 

ETHICAL NOTIFICATION TO SOUTHEAST ASIAN REGION

 

Dear governments of Bangladesh, Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia, on May 16, 2015, the Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights (BTHR) notifies that the government of Myanmar (Burma) and its president Thein Sein have been found Responsible for the charge of Genocide against the Rohingya people. Since in recent weeks there are tens of thousands of people fleeing into the sea to find another country and save their lives, they cannot be considered as “illegal immigrants” but they should be treated fully as “refugees”. Any kind of contempt for their physical, psychological and spiritual dignity constitutes a violation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and is also an act of complicity with Genocide of Myanmar. Since the refugees coming from the sea are being rejected, most of them dying of hunger and thirst, the Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights formally requests the governments of Bangladesh, Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia to provide urgent assistance to these innocent refugees, by giving them food, medicine and shelter, without having to wait a United Nations summit, which implies not to be accomplices of the fascist and neo-Nazi nationalism of the Government of Myanmar which is paradoxically using Buddhism as a spiritual endorsement of this terrifying persecution. In case that the governments of Bangladesh, Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia continue to deny aid to these refugees, the Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights will proceed with the accusation of complicity with Genocide.

Although the leaders of the contemporary civilization ignore these events, the Buddhist Spirituality cannot do so because it is the main beacon of light and hope for all humankind. Our humanitarian task will not be interrupted by hopelessness neither by the incomprehensible and inhuman acts of governments which do not help our fellow beings. The only solution to this global crisis is compassion.

 

Cordial greetings with spirit of reconciliation (maitri),

Buddhist Master Maitreya

Spiritual Guide and President of the International Buddhist Ethics Committee (IBEC) and Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights (BTHR)

Judgment on Myanmar Case

Case 02/2015: Myanmar

 

JUDGMENT AND ETHICAL CONCLUSION

 

Dear Prosecutor, Executive Secretary and Members of the Jury of the International Buddhist Ethics Committee (IBEC) and the Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights (BTHR), regarding the case reported by the World Association of Buddhism (WBA) and the International Association of Maitriyana (IAM) against the Government of Myanmar, on May 1, 2015, I confirm that the second case of the Buddhist Tribunal is concluded in order to analyze the violation of human rights by Myanmar and its President Thein Sein.

After the enormous amount of evidence presented and certified as valid, and following the refusal of the defendants to give statements, it has proceeded with the voting of 5 members of the Jury, by confirming that all of them sentenced as “Responsible” to the government of Myanmar for the serious crime of Genocide, Ethnic Cleansing and Crimes against Humanity. As these actions break the Buddhist ethical precepts, such as the abstention of harming other human beings, but also involve the most serious violation of the human rights, it is perceived that the Government of Myanmar reveals a complete racial and religious discrimination against defenseless citizens.  Concordantly, the evidences have shown that the Government of Myanmar is using supposed Buddhist monks such as Ashin Wirathu to incite the persecution and violence against thousands of Muslims, which leaves a dark stain on the history of the Buddhist Spirituality forever. In fact, as shown in the case of the supposed monk Wirathu, the Myanmar government is implementing a False Buddhism as a tool which is nothing but a fascist and neo-Nazi nationalism.

Although many fundamentalist Islamic groups in the world are committing massacres of thousands of human beings and certainly constitute a threat to world peace, like the guerrilla group Islamic State (ISIS) which will soon be investigated by the International Buddhist Ethics Committee and the Buddhist Tribunal on Rights Humans, there is strong evidence that the Myanmar government is perpetuating a Genocide, Ethnic Cleansing and Crimes against Humanity towards defenseless civilian populations, so that this terrible act against humanity is being indirectly supported and endorsed by the 969 Movement led by the false monk Ashin Wirathu.

Therefore, the International Buddhist Ethics Committee and Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights rules that the Spirituality created by Siddhartha Gautama, as a Way of Supreme Truth, must denounce the government of Myanmar as genocidal, recommending to the international community to remove all kind of support to Myanmar.

Following in the footsteps of the Master Siddhartha Gautama, the International Buddhist Ethics Committee and Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights has decided to proceed against the Myanmar government for provoking both a Genocide, Ethnic Cleansing and Crimes against Humanity and damage to the Buddhist Spirituality, reason by which Buddhists from all over the world have been convened to establish and clarify the facts of this case. The Jury members have been able to study testimonies that prove these terrifying crimes, which are very similar to the Nazi Holocaust: mass slaughter, concentration camps, para-governmental military forces similar to the SS which are kidnapping and raping entire families, prohibition of religious rights, creation of ghettos in the cities, stickers on stores or houses of the persecuted communities, denial of citizenship status and also negation of the condition of being humans towards the chased people. Indeed this persecution of thousands of Muslims from Myanmar is being addressed by the government as a case of self-defense, by alleging accusations against Muslims with a similar tone to what the Nazis said regarding the Jews. Yet, as it is Genocide, Ethnic Cleansing and Crimes against Humanity towards a Muslim people, within the global context of a growing resentment towards Islam, the UN and the leaders of the contemporary civilization are practically ignoring these horrific events, although they violate all the International treaties on Human Rights.

 

Sincerely,

With a reconciling spirit,

Buddhist Master Maitreya

Spiritual Guide and President of the International Buddhist Ethics Committee (IBEC) and Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights (BTHR)

Evidences of Myanmar Case

Case n° 02/2015:

Myanmar (Burma)

 

HONOURABLE JURY OF INTERNATIONAL BUDDHIST ETHICS COMMITTEE (IBEC) & BUDDHIST TRIBUNAL ON HUMAN RIGHTS (BTHR)

P R E S E N T . –

In the presence of the President and Spiritual Guide of the IBEC-BTHR Buddhist Master Maitreya, and the Executive Secretary of the IBEC-BTHR Master Yan MaitrI-Shi, it is addressed the case of GENOCIDE denounced by the World Association of Buddhism (WBA) against Myanmar.-

 

I, Sekkha Dhamma, as Prosecutor of IBEC and BTHR, acknowledge the hard and organized labour performed for the comprehensive compilation of Evidence in this case, similarly, I appreciate the contribution of them for the analysis concerning the Party I represent. That said, with all due respect I appear to expose:

Being received the list of digital media that were gathered, ordered and at the same time confirmed in their order and context as Evidence by the Executive Secretary of the IBEC and BTHR Master Yan Maitri-Shi, I give way to the Third Stage of Procedure called “EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE “, same one that is stated in the Constitutive Act of the IBEC and BTHR in order to know, establish, dictate and determine the Responsibility of actions and omissions committed by Myanmar (Burma), by the Government of the President Thein Sein, Police and Security Forces and Extremist Buddhist Groups, against Muslim Populations of the Arakan State. This Accusation of GENOCIDE is a Requirement performed by the WORLD ASSOCIATION OF BUDDHISM in the field of the Buddhist Ethics and Human Rights, an act which follows below:

 

EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE

FIRST EVALUATION.- By being the core part of this procedure, it is necessary to point out the Evidence Means offered by the Executive Secretary of the IBEC and BTHR Master Yan Maitri- Shi, and formally present them to the Jury for their knowledge, which are composed of 29 Evidence that proves the motivating Accusation of the current process, entitled with the Violation, Unlawfulness or corresponding Crime against Buddhist Spirituality and Human Rights, acts perpetrated in Myanmar (Burma) by the Government of President Thein Sein, Police and Security Forces and Extremist Buddhist Groups against Muslim Populations of the Arakan State. These Evidences, which mostly come from written or audiovisual testimonies, are listed below:

 

EVIDENCE 1: Validity of the Buddhist Committee and Tribunal

EVIDENCE 2: Police Indifference

EVIDENCE 3: Lack of Liberty

EVIDENCE 4: Case of ethnic cleansing

EVIDENCE 5: Anti-Muslim Rhetoric

EVIDENCE 6: Law that prohibits marriage between religions

EVIDENCE 7: failure to prevent genocide

EVIDENCE 8: Crimes against humanity

EVIDENCE 9: Complicity of the government

EVIDENCE 10: Campaign of ethnic cleansing

EVIDENCE 11: Testimonies of mass graves

EVIDENCE 12: Rohingya Testimonies about genocide

EVIDENCE 13: Escape of the Rohingyas

EVIDENCE 14: Concentration camps                                                                                        

EVIDENCE 15: Negation of Citizenship

EVIDENCE 16: Negation of Nationality to Rohingyas

EVIDENCE 17: Rohingyas excluded from the National Population Census

EVIDENCE 18: Deportation and forced population transfers

EVIDENCE 19: Persecution

EVIDENCE 20: Terror along with ethnic cleansing

EVIDENCE 21: Social Segregation

EVIDENCE 22: Slow genocide against the Rohingyas

EVIDENCE 23: Violence against innocent people

EVIDENCE 24: Racial segregation and genocide

EVIDENCE 25: Lack of attention regarding health and nutrition

EVIDENCE 26: Torture

EVIDENCE 27: Destruction of Muslim stores and buildings

EVIDENCE 28: Riots perpetrated by Buddhists

EVIDENCE 29: State Terrorism.-

 

SECOND EVALUATION.- Of the Tests provided there is no doubt about the authenticity of them, considering its origin, because in them lies Testimony or Declaration of World Organizations that watch over Human Rights as is the case of HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH; with the rest of the Evidence, each testimony compiled comes from an internet link where it is found the corresponding information that supports and strengthens the evidence through a news article.

Regarding all articles that are offered as a proof they are also labelled the actions and omissions perpetrated in Myanmar as terrible faults towards Buddhist Ethics and a clear Violation of Human Rights, (this without prejudice that at the same time the constituent elements of Crimes and their Criminal Responsibility are configured, case that does not concern to jurisdictionally decide on this matter by our Party), there is no objection, disqualification or validation of the digital content by the Party which I represent, by virtue of these are digital media derived from reliable sources and that also were formally and openly published at the time about acts, facts, events and statements reflected in writing and in video, from which there is no doubt about their authenticity and veracity, even more so when they were not legal appeals lodged, statements or clarifications for disclaimer, expressed and direct inconformity regarding what was published, the right of reply exercised or give rise to an investigation into the origin, reputation and veracity of what is expressed by public information means; this in charge of Myanmar (Burma), by the Government of President Thein Sein, Police and Security Forces and Buddhist Extremist Groups against Muslim Populations of the Arakan State.-

 

THIRD EVALUATION.- Regarding what was exposed, published, declared and reproduced in the media and organisms in defence of Human Rights that are now presented as digital Evidence for this case by the Executive Secretary of the IBEC and BTHR Master Yan Maitri-Shi, these proofs are determined by the Party I represent as Prosecutor of IBEC and BTHR as LEGITIMATE and VALID, evidences that sustain and confirm the Indictment presented by the WORLD ASSOCIATION OF BUDDHISM (WBA) concerning the Crime of GENOCIDE and multiple Violations of Human Rights

 

which in turn are consummated into Crimes, and into Violations against the Buddhist Ethics perpetrated in detriment of the Muslim people called Rohingya, residents of the Arakan State in Myanmar (Burma).-

In such a situation, it begins the Stage Four of the Procedure called “REPLY”, in which is set the term of 5 (five) days to the Accused and Requested Party Myanmar (Burma), in order that it emits the Reply they wish or corresponds to them facing the Indictment and Requirement with respect to the Evidence provided, accepted and valued by this writing.-

 

Sekkha Dhamma

Prosecutor of IBEC & BTHR

México April, 2015 (two thousand fifteen).-

 

—————————————–

 

Case against Myanmar (Burma)

 

EVIDENCE 1: Validity of the Committee and Buddhist Tribunal

Isabelle Arradon (deputy Asia director for Amnesty International): “A Truth-Finding Committee is a positive step, as long as it is part of an independent investigation to determine responsibility for the violence (in Burma) and its findings are released to the public, (…) But such a commission should not bar or replace criminal justice, or reparation for crimes under international law.” (http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2013/05/20135111126387968.html  May 2, 2013)

 

 

EVIDENCE 2: Police indifference

Win Htein (loyalty to Aung San Suu Kyi and the National League for Democracy): “I saw eight boys killed in front of me. I tried to stop the crowd, I told them to go home. But they threatened me, and the police pulled me away. (…) “The police did not do anything – I don’t know why “. (…) “On the bank thousands of people were cheering. When someone was killed, they cheered. And they were shouting ‘they killed our monk yesterday, we must kill them’. There were women, monks, young people. I feel disgusted – and ashamed.” (http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-22023830  April 4, 2013)

Anonymous Testimony: “The policemen were telling us to go back in to the village. At that time the Arakanese were coming toward us. We were trapped,” (…) “First they said they would protect us but when the violence started they took sides with the Arakanese people”.  (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/burmamyanmar/10008702/Burmese-security-filled-mass-graves-with-Muslims.html  April 22, 2013)

Nor Mohammed (Muslim leader of Joon Mosque): “On the night of the incident, the police were stationed at the right places. But they didn’t act to stop that mob. That’s why it got out of hand. (…) In their view, the Muslim population is growing fast, so we’ll eventually gobble up their kind. At any race, that’s their excuse. I believe someone is pulling the strings behind the scenes. (…) I dare not say”, (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GtAl9zJ3t-M  Source:  AJ Plus)

 

 

EVIDENCE 3: Lack of freedom

Pierre Peron (Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs in Myanmar): “Lack of movement means people don’t have access to their fields to go farming, don’t have access to the sea to go fishing, don’t have access to markets to trade,” (…) “The impact on freedom of movement is quite massive on hundreds of thousands of people.” (http://edition.cnn.com/2014/11/11/world/asia/myanmar-rohingya-minority/index.html       November 12, 2014)

Brad Adams (Human Rights Watch): “The Rohingyas are the world most forgotten abused people (…) There is not a part of a mature political discord it’s actually a signal to continue discriminate and the target are the Rohingya” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfC0aJwZjFI )

 

 

EVIDENCE 4: Case of ethnic cleansing

Matthew Smith (executive director of Fortify Rights): “There couldn’t be a clearer case of ethnic cleansing,” (…) “The authorities and local Buddhist populations are trying to change the ethnic demographics of the state through terror-inspiring means, and in some cases violence.” (http://edition.cnn.com/2014/11/11/world/asia/myanmar-rohingya-minority/index.html       November 12, 2014)

Human Righst Watch:Buddhist monks, political-party operatives and government officials organized themselves to permanently change the ethnic demographics of the state” (by removing every trace of the Rohingya). (http://world.time.com/2013/04/23/burma-accused-of-ethnic-cleansing-for-rohingya-violence/  April, 23, 2013)

Kyaw Myint (president of the National Democratic Party for Human Rights): They have their strategy, and they have done all these things as a planned, well-designed operation,” (http://world.time.com/2013/04/23/burma-accused-of-ethnic-cleansing-for-rohingya-violence/  April, 23, 2013)

 Nay San Lwin, (Rohingya activist now living in Germany): “100% sure the government is behind the killing. (…) If [the government] had the will to, they could stop [the violence] immediately,” (…). “If they continue like this, you will not find any Rohingya inside the country in five years’ time.” (http://world.time.com/2013/04/23/burma-accused-of-ethnic-cleansing-for-rohingya-violence/  April, 23, 2013)

 

 

EVIDENCE 5: Anti-Muslim rhetoric

Matthew Smith (executive director of Fortify Rights): “(extremists were) using social media as a platform to spread hateful anti-Muslim rhetoric and in some cases to incite violence.” (http://edition.cnn.com/2014/07/04/world/asia/myanmar-mandalay-religious-violence/  July 7, 2014)

 

 

EVIDENCE 6: Law prohibiting interfaith marriage

Thin Thin Aung (member of Women’s League of Burma):  “The objective is against Muslim people,” (…) “Almost all parts of these bills are aimed to target Muslims (…) it’s based on hatred against this minority religion.”  (http://edition.cnn.com/2014/05/29/world/asia/myanmar-interfaith-marriage-laws/index.html  June 4, 2014)

Mark Farmaner, director of Burma Campaign UK: “Ethnic and religious minorities in Burma are already suspicious that the Burman Buddhist dominated central government wants to either assimilate or suppress them,” (…) “The interfaith marriage laws play into the greatest fears of ethnic and religious minorities that the government sees the country as a Burman Buddhist country where ethnic and religious minorities are not considered equal.” (http://edition.cnn.com/2014/05/29/world/asia/myanmar-interfaith-marriage-laws/index.html  June 4, 2014)

 

 

EVIDENCE 7: Failing to prevent genocide

Matthew Smith (executive director of Fortify Rights): “It’s patently discriminatory,” (…) “The fact that lawmakers in Myanmar are considering a law like this now should serve as a wake-up call to the international community. Anti-Muslim discrimination is reaching unprecedented heights.” (…) “In Rakhine state, there’s an argument to be made that the government is failing to uphold its obligation to prevent genocide,” (…) “Passing a discriminatory law like this wouldn’t help the situation there.” (http://edition.cnn.com/2014/05/29/world/asia/myanmar-interfaith-marriage-laws/index.html  June 4, 2014)

Prudentienne Seward (survivor of the genocide in Rwanda):The United Nations has taken 20 years to apologise for its failure to recognise and prevent the Rwandan genocide; the international community should not repeat the same mistake in Myanmar”. (http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/tun-khin/rohingya-genocide-burma-being-ignored_b_5254141.html  May 5, 2014)

 

 

EVIDENCE 8: Crimes against humanity

Human Rights Watch: “Conforme al derecho internacional, los crímenes de lesa humanidad son delitos cometidos como parte de un ataque generalizado o sistemático perpetrado por un gobierno u organización contra una población civil. Entre los delitos de lesa humanidad cometidos contra los rohingyas desde el mes de junio se cuentan asesinatos, deportaciones, traslados forzados de la población y persecuciones.” (http://www.hrw.org/es/news/2013/04/22/birmania-debe-poner-fin-la-limpieza-etnica-de-musulmanes-rohingyas  por HRW 22/04/2013)

Tomás Ojea Quintana (UN special rapporteur on Human Rights): (the developments in Rakhine were the latest in a) “long history of discrimination and persecution against the Rohingya Muslim community which could amount to crimes against humanity”. (http://www.aljazeera.com/news/asia-pacific/2014/09/myanmar-confirms-controversial-rohingya-plan-2014930193550936131.html  September 30, 2014)

Phil Robertson (deputy Asia director of Human Rights Watch):  “Burma should accept an independent international commission to investigate crimes against humanity in Arakan State, locate victims, and provide redress,” (…) “Burma’s donors need to wake up and realize the seriousness of the Rohingya’s plight, and demand that the government urgently stop abuses, promote the safe return of displaced Muslims, and ensure accountability to end the deadly cycle of violence in Arakan State” (http://www.hrw.org/news/2013/04/22/burma-end-ethnic-cleansing-rohingya-muslims  April 22, 2013)

Human Rights Watch:   “Many of the serious abuses committed against the Rohingya and other Muslims in Arakan State since June 2012 amount to crimes against humanity.” (…) “According to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), crimes against humanity are certain criminal acts, including murder, torture, and persecution “committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack.” International legal jurisprudence provides that the attack must be widespread or systematic, but need not be both. “Widespread” refers to the scale of the acts or number of victims and a “systematic” attack indicates “a pattern or methodical plan.” The attack must also be part of a state or “organizational” policy.” (…) “Non-state organizations – such as the RNDP and the Buddhist sangha (order of monks) in Arakan State – can be responsible for crimes against humanity if they are demonstrated to have a sufficient degree of organization.”  (…) “Forced population transfers, forced deportation, and persecution are specific crimes against humanity set out by the Rome Statute and other international courts that are particularly relevant to the situation in Arakan State.” (http://www.hrw.org/node/114872/section/13  Reported by HRW)

 

 

EVIDENCE 9: Government complicity

Master Yan Maitri-Shi: According to the prestigious human rights organization Human Rights Watch, many violations of human rights especially against the Rohingya and other Muslim people are occurring while the Burma government is doing nothing to prevent or solve this serious situation. There is talk of ethnic cleansing, digging mass graves to destroy evidence of crimes, government complicity is such acts, among other things. (http://www.hrw.org/news/2013/04/22/burma-end-ethnic-cleansing-rohingya-muslims  April 22, 2013)

Phil Robertson (deputy Asia director of Human Rights Watch):  : “En octubre, las fuerzas de seguridad miraban hacia otro lado mientras turbas de arakaneses atacaban los asentamientos de musulmanes, o bien se sumaban a la matanza y las quemas”, (…). “Seis meses más tarde, el gobierno sigue culpando a la ‘violencia en la comunidad’ por las muertes y los destrozos cuando, en realidad, el gobierno sabía lo que estaba ocurriendo y pudo haber actuado para impedirlo”. (…) “Funcionarios locales y líderes de la comunidad participaron en un esfuerzo organizado para demonizar y aislar a la población musulmana como preludio a sanguinarios ataques perpetrados por turbas”, (…). “Incluso, desde la matanza, el gobierno central no ha adoptado ninguna medida para castigar a los responsables ni revertir la limpieza étnica de los musulmanes que fueron desplazados por la fuerza”. (http://www.hrw.org/es/news/2013/04/22/birmania-debe-poner-fin-la-limpieza-etnica-de-musulmanes-rohingyas  April 22, 2013)

 

 

EVIDENCE 10: Campaign of ethnic cleansing

Phil Robertson (deputy Asia director):  “The Burmese government engaged in a campaign of ethnic cleansing against the Rohingya (Muslims) that continues today through the denial of aid and restrictions on movement,” (…) “The government needs to put an immediate stop to the abuses and hold the perpetrators accountable or it will be responsible for further violence against ethnic and religious minorities in the country.” (http://www.hrw.org/news/2013/04/22/burma-end-ethnic-cleansing-rohingya-muslims  April 22, 2013)

Human Rights Watch:For instance, on June 13, a government truck dumped 18 naked and half-clothed bodies near a Rohingya displaced person camp outside of Sittwe, the state capital. Some of the victims had been “hogtied” with string or plastic strips before being executed. By leaving the bodies near a camp for displaced Rohingya, the soldiers were sending a message – consistent with a policy of ethnic cleansing – that the Rohingya should leave permanently. (…) “Said a Rohingya man, who saw the bodies being dumped: Three bodies had gunshot wounds, Some had burns, some had stab wounds, One gunshot wound was on the forehead, one on the chest.” (http://www.hrw.org/news/2013/04/22/burma-end-ethnic-cleansing-rohingya-muslims  April 22, 2013)

 

 

EVIDENCE 11: Mass graves testimonies

Human Rights Watch: Human Rights Watch uncovered evidence of four mass-grave sites in Arakan State, three dating from the immediate aftermath of the June violence and one from the October violence. Rohingya men who participated in digging mass graves told us that they did so under orders from the authorities in four different areas: Yan Thei village in Mrauk-U Township and at three different sites near the Ba Du Baw IDP camp outside Sittwe. Several Rohingya said they had witnessed a large mass grave being dug by army personnel outside Ba Du Baw IDP camp.” (…) “Witnesses said that on June 13, a government truck arrived at an area outside Ba Du Baw IDP camp and dumped 18 naked and half-clothed bodies in a pile. (…) Human Rights Watch obtained photos from local sources showing a cluster of bodies, including at least one of a child. Although Human Rights Watch was unable to confirm the identities of the victims, local witnesses and those who buried the bodies asserted they were Rohingya .(…) Some bodies had their hands still bound, and appeared to have been killed execution style.  Many showed signs of blunt force trauma, stab wounds, and gunshot wounds. Human Rights Watch visited the location where the photos were taken and learned at least three Rohingya men had been ordered to bury the bodies in two nearby graves.”                                                                            (http://www.hrw.org/node/114872/section/8)

Rohingya elderly man: “All the bodies were placed in a mass grave. I personally buried them.” (…) “They were waiting for the government to mete out justice. But no action was taken.” (…) “After 2 pm, they asked me for petrol. But I couldn’t supply them with any. They brought me out of the house to the front yard and hit me on my back with the butt of a gun. Then they took me to the NaSaKa camp. They shackled my legs. I was severely beaten.” (…) “When the government forces surrounded the village, they captured the village leaders. People were running away. They thought they might be captured. Then government forces opened fire. Children were followed their fathers into the creek. Some of them were shot dead as they run and others swam across the creek. About 25 children drowned. Those who were gunned down and drowned floated on the water. After the military left, people recovered all the bodies. Those still in the creek were gathered up using fishing nets.” (…) “I went to the graveyard to see if any of my relatives were among the dead. I found no relatives, only friends. All the bodies were placed in a mass grave. I personally buried them.”  (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KG2kdcmZG0 Source: Al Jazeera)

12-year girl who is niece of Mohammed Islam: “In front of me of my cousins were killed. They were picked up and thrown into the fire.”(…) My cousins stayed in their house. They were small children. When the Rakhine came, everybody was looking for their parents. My parents would not have found me If I’d not run to grab their hands. My cousins were sitting and crying. The Rakhine picked up five of my cousins and threw them into the flames. If only I’d been older I would have killed those Rakhine. (…) We sat by the sea crying. My uncle came and told us to escape with him as they were killing and burning everyone. When my mother refused, I told her about how my uncles were mutilated and my cousins were thrown into the fire. My mother was stunned and shocked.”  (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KG2kdcmZG0 Source: Al Jazeera)

 

 

EVIDENCE 12: Rohingya Testimonies of Genocide

Human Rights Watch: “That night [October 23], we could not collect the dead. We collected them in the morning but we could not bury them. We had to wait one day for [government] approval. Once we received permission we … put three or four bodies in one hole, and many more in other holes. … The [larger] holes we dug were 10 feet wide and several feet deep. We made at least one very big hole and other smaller ones. At first we buried the bodies in single graves but then the soldiers said we should dig bigger graves because single graves would take too much time. They wanted it done quickly. It was both the police and army who ordered us to dig bigger graves. They were watching over us.” (…) “We dug the graves. We buried 11 men, 20 women, and nearly 30 children. At that time the children couldn’t escape with their parents. All the children were killed by knife, and then they threw them into the fire. They had burns. I brought some of the burned, dead bodies here to bury them. We buried the dead bodies after getting permission from the army. When we were burying the bodies, the security forces were standing nearby. They were together, the army and the police.” (…) “There were three military trucks. I saw them digging a pit and one truck was parked near the pit. When we passed by the funeral ground, there were two men holding shovels over a pit. There were bad smells and no one was allowed to pass through there. I saw one person who tried to go into the area and he was stopped by the military. The men next to the pit had on undershirts and military uniform trousers. I saw them take a lot of dead bodies out of one truck. I saw them drop them next to the pit. I also saw a coffin being laid on the ground. There was one coffin and the rest were piled up bodies. If I guessed I would say there were around 50 or 60 bodies. Some bodies had clothes on, some didn’t.” (http://www.hrw.org/node/114872/section/8  April 22, 2013)

This is a short documentary film where it is shown some testimonies of Rohingya people that were attacked or who have lost any parent because of the extremist groups of Buddhists: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nSihfWY41So

A 9-year girl: “They asked us to lie face down on the ground and tied our hands. They beat dad with an iron pipe. They put us on a bench and asked if anybody else was hiding. My dad was worried that I would say something wrong so he answered for me. They hit him and blood poured from his mouth.” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hoi5On6hq68  by SBS Dateline)

A student who survived the violence: “Someone told us, Don’t go that way, because it will get worse up ahead. You’ll all be killed. The first group had about 15 students. All were beaten. They were the first to go and the first to be beaten. If they fell down, their bodies were covered with leaves and they poured petrol on them and burned them, still alive. One of the students has his head chopped off”. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hoi5On6hq68  by SBS Dateline)

A Rohingya woman: “When they [the Buddhist people] saw a Muslim, even a child, [they] would throw stones at him. We lived like dogs.” (…) “The military took the bodies of their loved ones away. (…) Men were taken away [by the authorities] to unknown places. Others went into hiding. Women were grabbed and raped.” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KG2kdcmZG0 Source: Al Jazeera)

A Rohingya man: “Two to four people were stationed there by a bridge over a creek. At night, we watch them through a fence. I saw the military and parliamentary police taking bodies out of trucks and burying them. There were light bulbs so we could see them. Others on the ground would catch the bodies. They push them with their feet into the soft mud near the bridge. (…) There were about 100 dead bodies.”. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KG2kdcmZG0 Source: Al Jazeera)

 

 

EVIDENCE 13: Escape of Rohingya people

Human Rights Watch: In June and October 2012, there was again a massive Rohingya flight from Burma, which in some cases resulted in deaths at sea. In 2012, an estimated 13,000 people, including Rohingya and some Bangladeshi nationals, took to the high seas via the Bay of Bengal on smuggler’s boats. In the last three months of 2012 alone, which marks the first half of the so-called “sailing season” (usually October through March) for the Rohingya when the seas calm, an estimated 5,000 Rohingya fled by boat from the Bangladesh-Burma border area on 49 boats, dwarfing the exodus of previous years. In February 2013, Thai officials announced that at least 6,000 Rohingya, including men, women, and children, had arrived on Thai shores.  (http://www.hrw.org/node/114872/section/9  report by HRW)

 

 

EVIDENCE 14: Concentration camps

Human Rights Watch:  “President Thein Sein said that the “only solution” to the situation in Arakan State was to send “illegal” Rohingya to “third countries” or to refugee camps overseen by UNHCR” (http://www.hrw.org/node/114872/section/10 report by HRW)

President Thein Sein (Myanmar):We will take care of our own ethnic nationalities, but Rohingyas who came to Burma illegally are not of our ethnic nationalities and we cannot accept them here. … The solution to this problem is that they can be settled in refugee camps managed by UNHCR, and UNHCR provides [sic] for them. If there are countries that would accept them, they could be sent there” (http://www.hrw.org/node/114872/section/10  April 22, 2013)

Graeme Wood: “the Rohingya are nearly friendless in their displaced-person camps and grim ghettos”. (http://www.newrepublic.com/article/116241/burma-2014-countryside-concentration-camps  January 21, 2014)

A man from the concentration camp Aung Mingalar: “They beat us up when we go out. We can’t make a living. If we go out, we are beaten up and sent to the police station. So, we can’t do anything. Life is difficult. We have no food and no job. Every few weeks we are given rations of rice. We have nothing to eat. There are people who starve for days.” (Rohingyas are trapped and they are prohibited to leave the place) (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KG2kdcmZG0 Source: Al Jazeera)

 

 

EVIDENCE 15: Denial of citizenship

Human Rights Watch: “UN agencies and others have long recognized the denial of citizenship to Rohingya as a root cause of the violence in Arakan State. At the core of the problem is Burma’s discriminatory 1982 Citizenship Law” (…) “Burma’s 1982 Citizenship Law designates three categories of citizens: full citizens; associate citizens; and naturalized citizens. Color-coded Citizenship Scrutiny Cards are issued according to citizenship status – pink, blue, and green, respectively. Many Rohingya hold white cards, or “temporary registration cards,” which come with no citizenship rights. These national identity cards contain ethnic and religious biographical details that facilitate discrimination by local officials against Muslims and other religious and ethnic minorities.” (…) “Several Rohingya told Human Rights Watch that during the violence in June and October, local authorities or groups of Arakanese confiscated their ID cards” (http://www.hrw.org/node/114872/section/12 reported by HRW)

U Hla Soe (general secretary of the Arakanese-dominated political party RNDP): “We think that pro-Rohingya Islamic radicals have penetrated the exiled media, so the voice of Rohingya becomes louder and louder. … They are demanding to be an ethnic nationality, and this we don’t accept. The citizenship issue is very delicate. We hope that exiled radical forces in the West will stop the instigation, because these Muslim people are ignorant people. It is very easy to stimulate and instigate them. (http://www.hrw.org/node/114872/section/12  April 22, 2013)

 

 

EVIDENCE 16: Nationality denied to Rohingya people

Human Rights Watch:While some Rohingya trace their lineage in Burma back centuries, many Muslims families in Arakan State migrated to and settled in Arakan during the British colonial period, which under the 1982 Citizenship Law directly excludes them from full citizenship. Rohingya whose families settled in the region during the colonial period would be eligible for less-than-full citizenship but are in effect excluded because of their inability to provide conclusive evidence of their lineage. Even those Rohingya whose families settled in the region before 1823 face the onerous burden of proving this to the satisfaction of the skeptical authorities, making it nearly impossible to secure Burmese citizenship” (http://www.hrw.org/node/114872/section/12 )

Zigor Aldama: “Kyaw Min is the president of the Democracy and Human Rights Party, and showed Al Jazeera many old documents to prove the existence of the Rohingya in the country, known also as Burma, before British colonization.” (http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2014/02/myanmar-buddhist-rohingya-ethnic-divide-20142211421962209.html  February 4, 2014)

Kyaw Min: “We have an ethnic connection with India, because we have always lived in the border, and it’s true that there are some similarities with the people of today’s Bangladesh. But in 785, Burma occupied what is now Rakhine state, formerly known as Arakan, and we’ve lived there since then”. (http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2014/02/myanmar-buddhist-rohingya-ethnic-divide-20142211421962209.html  February 4, 2014)

President Thein Sein of Myanmar: “We will take responsibility for ethnic nationalities but it is not at all possible to recognize the illegal border-crossing Rohingyas who are not of our ethnicity.(…) The stability and peace, the democratization process and the development of the country which are only in transition right now could be severely affected and much would be lost.” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfC0aJwZjFI )

 

 

EVIDENCE 17: Rohingya excluded from the national census

Human Rights Watch: “Burma’s last census in 1983 excluded the Rohingya. There are concerns the Rohingya will again be excluded from the census: in July 2012, Burma’s immigration minister, Khin Yi, announced the Rohingya would not be included in the new census.(http://www.hrw.org/node/114872/section/12  )

 

 

EVIDENCE 18: Deportation and Forced Population Transfers

Human Rights Watch: Widespread and systematic attacks by Arakanese, with the participation of state security forces in many instances, forcibly displaced over 125,000 Muslims from their homes. At least another 20,000 others are known to have fled the country during that time. Underlying these crimes was an evident goal of the majority Buddhist population to drive out Muslim populations.” (…) “The Burmese government has restricted the delivery of humanitarian aid to the Rohingya, and in some areas continues to do so. The government has also attempted to move displaced Rohingya and other Muslims to areas where there has long been a high Muslim concentration – in the north of the state – indicating intent to change the demographic profile of the state by segregating the two primary religious communities” (…) “After June 2012, the RNDP and the Buddhist sangha in Arakan State both issued public statements and at times spoke to the media, explicitly calling for the isolation, departure and removal of Rohingya from Buddhist areas in the state. Members of these organizations committed apparent incitement to violence and participated in attacks that were at least consistent with the expressed positions of their organizations.” (…)  “the security forces began abusive sweeps and mass arrests of hundreds of Rohingya men and boys. The seeming randomness of these arrests, incommunicado detention, and reports of torture and ill-treatment in detention have combined to instill widespread fear in Muslim neighborhoods and villages.” (http://www.hrw.org/node/114872/section/13 )

Chris Lewa (Arakan Project): “It is part of an ‘ethnic cleansing package’ of restrictions and oppression to compel them to leave” (http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2014/08/myanmar-rohingya-deprived-education-201484105134827695.html  August 4, 2014)

Nijam Mohammed (human rights activist and Rohingya refugee): “According to international law, if you are forced to leave your country because of political or religious persecution, you have a right for refugee status” (…) “My question is why are these people not getting refugee status in Bangladesh? Why are the Western countries silent? Are they not interested because there is no oil or gas in Arakan state [in Myanmar]? (…) “We do not fight for our independence, we only fight for our rights,” (http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2014/01/no-respite-rohingya-bangladesh-201411675944519957.html  January 16, 2014)

 

 

EVIDENCE 19: Persecution

Human Rights Watch: “Persecutory acts have been found to include murder, sexual assault, beatings, destruction of livelihood, and deportation and forced transfer, among others.” (…) “Both acts of violence and other apparently discriminatory actions – such as the majority Buddhist community depriving Rohingya of access to their livelihoods or to food to force them to leave – might be considered acts of persecution that amount to crimes against humanity.”       (http://www.hrw.org/node/114872/section/13 )

Muhammad Ismail (spent a year living in a displacement camp for Rohingya in Sittwe) :The government and the Rakhine people worked together to attack the Rohingya and other Muslim people. They killed men, women and children,” (…). “After our homes were burned down, we were moved to the displacement camps, and one day I was arrested traveling without a permit. The police took my identity documents, and my name was blacklisted. When I got back to the camp, I knew I had to leave the country.”(…) “Many Rohingya are leaving [Myanmar] by boat, and the navy sometimes attacks the boats,” (…) “Hundreds have been killed like this. You can see the dead bodies of women, children and old people floating in the waters.” (http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/11/26/bangladesh-proposesinterningrepatriatingupto270krohingyatomyanma.html November 26, 2014)

Abdul Majeed (Islamic preacher who had to flee from Myanmar after the violent persecution): “I am lucky to be alive. My old parents still live there. There is total mayhem in my village in Arakan state and youth are specially targeted,” (…) “Schools are burnt down and mosques are demolished. There is no freedom to practice our religion in Burma”, (http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2014/01/rohingya-exiles-struggle-survive-india-201416143243337187.html  January 6, 2014)

On this video it is found the evidence of piles of hand-tied corpses, which proves the persecution against the Rohingya Muslims: http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2013/05/20135111126387968.html  May 2, 2013)

Mohammed Islam: “We went to the mosque at 9 pm to pray. At midnight a group of Rakhines came and asked what we were doing. (…) There were about 400 people in the mosque and the compound. Some 20 or 40 people died and the rest escaped. Those who died were all religious people. They had remained inside the mosque. The NaSaKa [paramilitary] lined them up in the mosque yard and shoot them all dead. (…) The NaSaKa started firing into the air and then directly at us. About 20 or 30 people died. We decided to fight back by grabbing them, even if it costs many lives. (…) 300 or 400 people had died by the time we caught their people. (…) They weren’t more than 15 metres from us and they were shooting everywhere. (…) I heard two of my brothers had died. Also three of my cousins and two of my brothers-in-law.”, (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KG2kdcmZG0 Source: Al Jazeera)

Mohammed Islam’s wife: “They carried bottles of petrol. They would throw the petrol on the roof of a house and then light it with a matchstick. The entire house exploded in flames. They also poured petrol on mosques. (…) We thought they wouldn’t possibly burn down the whole of Sittwe. So we stayed at home. But we were wrong. The authorities came torch our houses too. Rakhine came first and then government forces in jeeps. (…) Two of my brothers went out and one stayed behind. One brother was immediately attacked by a monk from the monastery. My brother was cut to pieces. So badly mutilated they couldn’t carry him back. (…) The authorities shot at him but missed. (…) Them some Rakhine grabbed him and cut him to pieces. My elder brother cried out. But he too was shot in the head. My mother lost her mind. (…) We thought my husband had been killed. But thank God he was alive. He rushed to our boat. He was in a state of shock.” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KG2kdcmZG0 Source: Al Jazeera)

A Buddhist woman whose husband was killed by Muslims in the mob: “I don’t think they targeted him specifically. I think he was a convenient target who happened to cross their path. They went out to transport the wounded to the hospital – Buddhist or Muslim. It didn’t matter.” [The interview was interrupted by a government agent] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GtAl9zJ3t-M  Source:  AJ Plus)

 

 

EVIDENCE 20: Terror and Ethnic Cleansing

Human Rights Watch:  Human Rights Watch has documented a pattern of human rights violations in Arakan State that amount to “ethnic cleansing” of the Rohingya and other Muslims from their areas of residence. Although “ethnic cleansing” is not formally defined under international law, a UN Commission of Experts has defined the term as a “purposeful policy designed by one ethnic or religious group to remove by violent and terror-inspiring means the civilian population of another ethnic or religious group from certain geographic areas. . . . This purpose appears to be the occupation of territory to the exclusion of the purged group or groups.” (…) “the orchestrated violence in Arakan State, particularly in October, involved near simultaneous attacks by Arakanese against Rohingya villages and settlements. The violence, largely carried out by mobs armed with a variety of weapons, appeared organized and inspired by higher entities, including the RNDP and the sangha. State security forces stood by and watched or participated in the killing, and later disposed of the bodies in a manner that hindered rather than helped investigations.” (…) “ethnic cleansing was reflected in the terror tactics of the Arakanese attackers. According to survivors, the mobs relentlessly killed all those they could catch. They hacked children to death with machetes and threw some into fires. Muslim neighborhoods and entire villages were burned to the ground. State security forces deprived the outnumbered Muslims of their weapons in anticipation of the slaughter. And when the slaughter happened, they dumped the Rohingya bodies in areas inhabited by Rohingya displaced persons – no doubt to send a message of terror”                                                                                (http://www.hrw.org/node/114872/section/13  Reported by HRW)

 

 

EVIDENCE 21: Social Segregation

Al Jazeera:Myanmar has confirmed to the United Nations it is finalising a plan that will offer minority Rohingya Muslims citizenship if they change their ethnicity to suggest Bangladeshi origin, a move rights groups say could force thousands into detention camps.” September 30, 2014 (http://www.aljazeera.com/news/asia-pacific/2014/09/myanmar-confirms-controversial-rohingya-plan-2014930193550936131.html)

Phil Robertson (deputy Asia director of Human Rights Watch): This plan is profoundly troubling because it would strip the Rohingya of their rights, systematically lock them down in closed camps in what amounts to arbitrary, indefinite detention,”  (http://www.aljazeera.com/news/asia-pacific/2014/09/myanmar-confirms-controversial-rohingya-plan-2014930193550936131.html  September 30, 2014)

Phil Robertson (deputy Asia director of Human Rights Watch): To be frank, the plan is a blueprint for permanent segregation and statelessness that appears designed to strip the Rohingya of any remnants of hope that they had for returning to a situation like that before the 2012 violence, when Rohingya Muslims and Rakhine Buddhists were able to co-exist.” (…) “It’s worth considering that just two years ago before the 2012 violence, Sittwe, the capital city of Rakhine State, was roughly divided 50-50 between Rohingya and Arakanese residents. Under this plan, that will never happen again. The idea of reconciliation has been thrown aside in this plan, and replaced with so-called “peaceful co-existence” – which in my view will mean a permanent segregation of the two communities, with the separation enforced by the might of the Myanmar army and police.”   (http://www.dw.de/hrw-slams-myanmars-rohingya-plan-as-a-blueprint-for-segregation/a-17972391  October 3, 2014 By DW & http://www.hrw.org/news/2014/10/05/burmas-rohingya-plan-blueprint-segregation October 6, 2014 By HRW)

Human Rights Watch: “Los rohingyas desplazados no han sido consultados acerca de su derecho a regresar a sus localidades y aldeas originales, lo cual refuerza el temor de que se pretenda segregar a esta población a largo plazo.”  (http://www.hrw.org/es/news/2013/04/22/birmania-debe-poner-fin-la-limpieza-etnica-de-musulmanes-rohingyas  por HRW 22/04/2013)

Al Jazzera: “Dr Aye Maung, from Rakhine Nationalities Development Party released a statement demanding that Bengali people should be relocated to suitable places (…) in order not to reside or mix with Rakhines.” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KG2kdcmZG0 Source: Al Jazeera)

 

 

EVIDENCE 22: Slow Genocide of Rohingya people

Dr. Maung Zarni: Video Conference titled “Genocide towards Rogingya People in Myanmar” (http://www.maungzarni.net/search/label/Myanmar_Racism_Watch  November 4, 2014)

 

 

EVIDENCE 23: Violence against innocent people

Human Rights Watch: “Burmese officials, community leaders and Buddhist monks organized and encouraged ethnic Arakanese backed by state security forces to conduct coordinated attacks on Muslim neighborhoods and villages in October 2012 to terrorize and forcibly relocate the population,” (…) “Included in the death toll were 28 children who were hacked to death, including 13 under age 5.” (http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2015/2/myanmars-buddhist-terrorism-problem.html  February 18, 2015)

US President Obama: “There is no excuse for violence against innocent people,” (…) “And the Rohingya hold within themselves the same dignity as you do.” (http://www.newrepublic.com/article/116241/burma-2014-countryside-concentration-camps  January 21, 2014)

On this video it is observed a speech of President Obama asking to stop the violence against Rohingya people and it can be observed some testimonies of Rohingya people in what remains of a village burned to the ground by extremist Buddhist groups from Burma, in addition it can be seen the authorities restricting the entry of the media to the village, as well as by prohibiting villagers to talk to reporters: http://www.channel4.com/news/as-obama-visits-burma-stories-emerge-of-a-massacre

 

 

EVIDENCE 24: Apartheid and Genocide

Aung Win (prominent Rohingya leader in the camps): “It’s just plain apartheid and genocide”. (http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2014/02/myanmar-buddhist-rohingya-ethnic-divide-20142211421962209.html  February 4, 2014)

Tun Khin (President of the Burmese Rohingya Organisation UK): “Legal experts, academics, and NGOs working in Burma identified key elements of genocide which are taking place there. These included denying Rohingya legal existence and right to nationality; access to medicine, food, and other basic necessities to sustain life; policies of extensive structures of discrimination, and allowing and facilitating hatred and popular violence against the Rohingya. Combined, these threaten to lead to the extermination of Rohingya as an ethnic group in Burma. (…) Within Burma debate about the Rohingya is very different. Aung San Suu Kyi has dismissed without viewing it evidence complied by Human Rights Watch that ethnic cleansing of the Rohingya has taken place. (…) This is why the discussions on genocide take on a special significance. (…) The situation for the Rohingya has been bad for decades, but it has got much worse since Thein Sein became President. There are around a million Rohingya in Burma, and every one of them is living in fear for their lives. (…) We have long faced restrictions on movement, restrictions on access to healthcare, to education, extortion, beatings, people disappeared, arrest , arbitrary executions and occasionally, mass killings. The list of human rights violations and repressive laws and policies have been well documented. Life for us was already intolerable. Now it is even worse. (…) We are subject to a systematic campaign to force us out of Burma. It is a campaign that has support from the highest level of the government, the President himself. (…) A new form of apartheid is being created to segregate us. To put us into camps or isolated villages where life will be so terrible people will be forced to leave the country. (…) Privately the British government, the USA, the EU and others know what is being done to the Rohingya violates international law. But they have chosen not to act. They have even chosen to be silent about international law and the Rohingya. (…) I appeal to the world not to let another Rwanda repeat for Rohingya.” (http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/tun-khin/rohingya-genocide-burma-being-ignored_b_5254141.html  May 5, 2014)

Professor William Schabas (president of the International Association of Genocide Scholars): “When you see measures preventing births, trying to deny the identity of the people, hoping to see that they really are eventually, that they no longer exist; denying their history, denying the legitimacy of their right to live where they live, these are all warning signs that mean it’s not frivolous to envisage the use of the term genocide.” (http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/aljazeerainvestigates/2012/12/2012125122215836351.html  January 16, 2013)

 

 

EVIDENCE 25: Lack of Health Care and food

Al Jazeera: “The medical aid organization Doctors Without Borders has been forced to stop caring for sick people in a Myanmar state torn by sectarian violence after the humanitarian group’s license was suspended by the government over the group’s work with the long-persecuted Rohingya Muslim minority” (…) “The government has vehemently denied allegations that a Buddhist mob rampaged through a village, killing women and children, but Doctors Without Borders said it treated 22 injured and traumatized Rohingya.” (…) “The United Nations says more than 40 Rohingya were killed in the attack, but the government says only one Buddhist policeman died.” (http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/2/28/doctors-without-borderskickedoutofwesternmyanmar.html  February 28, 2014)

Master Yan Maitri-Shi: “On this video, titled No where to go…Ethnic cleansing of Rohingya Muslims in Burma, it can be observed how the Rohingya people is living in the so-called refugees camps, where there is no sufficient food and where they are isolated and are being deprived from their rights to be citizens of Burma. In addition they suffer serious diseases and they have no access to basic medical care.  They are provided with 1 or 2 kg of rice and a litre of oil per month, so they are malnourished and they are dying slowly and incredibly the hospitals refuse to treat them. There are only 2 doctors for attending 120.000 people.”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MudrEBFwfGk

Video on Life conditions for Rhingya in Myanmar: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=I4wMTB68PsE  by Dr Maung Zarni. Some Details: Only Rohingya are subjected to a national policy of forced sterilization and birth control; 60.000 children are unregistered & denied nationality; 1 doctor to 76.000-83.000 Rohingya… National average: 1 doctor to 700 Burmese; 90% of adult Rohingya are illiterate… But the national rate is only 20% illiteracy; 200.000 Rohingya are held captive in camps; More than 1 million Rohingya confined to 11 security grids,  their neighborhoods really from where they cannot move about; Nearly 1 million driven out of the country since 1978

 

 

EVIDENCE 26: Torture

Human Rights Watch:In late December 2008, several small boats packed with hundreds of people, mostly ethnic Rohingya Muslims from western Burma, many of them emaciated, landed in India’s Andaman Islands. Passengers told Indian authorities they had originally landed in Thailand, that Thai authorities held them for two days on a deserted island, and that they then towed them back out to sea, giving them only a few sacks of rice and a little water. Some told officials and doctors that while at sea they had been tortured by Burmese sailors who stopped their vessel.” (http://www.asia-pacific-solidarity.net/southeastasia/burma/reports/burma0509_brochure_web.pdf )

Rohingya young man: “They know no mercy. Only God knows how much we were tortured.” (…) “On one side of the mosque there is a monastery. From there, lots of stones were hurled at the mosque.” (…) “They pulled me away and kicked my wife. They tied my hands behind my back. Armed men pointed their guns at my head and I was severely beaten.  My two children were crying. They beat me again outside the house. At first I thought it was only me, but I saw others being picked up. (…) When they caught me, they slammed the gun butt hard into my chest. It stills hurts me. Then they beat me repeatedly. They were without mercy.” (…) “Inside the police station there were six dead bodies. They were wrapped in mats. They were taken away somewhere. They had beaten so severely their bones and skulls were broken.”  (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KG2kdcmZG0 Source: Al Jazeera)

Jannat Ara: “After Friday prayers, when the violence erupted everyone panicked. People were running, trying to hide. My sons, who had gone to pray, also hid. I remained at home and closed all the doors. Paramilitary police surrounded our housed and pushed open the doors. They found me upstairs. It happened on the bed. I was grabbed. They held me down and kicked me. After that I knew nothing. When I regained consciousness in hospital I realized what had happened to me. (…) They burned our houses and shops. They looted shops and stole huge quantities of goods. I saw boys and girls gunned down. The bodies were packed in plastic bags. They were buried in mud under the bridge without a funeral. (…) They admitted me to hospital. When the paramilitary and the Rakhine were attacking the hospital, my brothers and other relatives helped me cross the river to Bangladesh in a boat. ” (…) “I’ve sold everything I own. What will we do with our children? ” (Rohingya woman, who was raped by at least 20 men according to medical records, she contracted a kidney disease and aborted a pregnancy because of her injuries. Later she died because of her serious rape injuries. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KG2kdcmZG0 Source: Al Jazeera)

 

 

EVIDENCE 27: Destruction of Muslim stores or buildings

Video source: (http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=702_1369713980)

 

 

EVIDENCE 28: Disturbs perpetrated by Buddhist people

Video source: (http://www.channel4.com/news/burma-ethnic-cleansing-myanmar-rohingya)

 

 

EVIDENCE 29: State-sponsored terrorism

Muslim religious leader: “In my opinion, this is just a political game. If I have a chance to use the word, I would say it is like a state-sponsored terrorism.”  (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hoi5On6hq68  by SBS Dateline)

 

Case 41: Rigpa & Sogyal Rinpoche

Case 41-2018: Sogyal Rinpoche & Rigpa Cult

The International Buddhist Ethics Committee finds them RESPONSIBLE of the charges:

  • Torture and Slavery
  • Fraud and Organized Crime
  • Violation of Women’s Rights
  • Violation of Buddhist Law
  • Crimes against Humanity

 

Evidences of Sogyal Rinpoche Case

Public Defense on Sogyal Rinpoche

Judgment on Rigpa & Sogyal Rinpoche

Notification to Matthieu Ricard and Karuna-Shechen

Legal Act on Dzongsar Khyentse Rinpoche

Legal Requirement to the de facto Leader of Tibetan Buddhism

Official Statement to the FBI

Legal Warning to Professor Robert Thurman