Decree on the Quarantine and the Coronavirus

CASE 27-2017: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR)

DECREE ON THE QUARANTINE AND THE CORONAVIRUS

April 23, 2020

HAVING SEEN the Judgment and the subsequent actions of the “IACHR Case” carried out by the International Buddhist Ethics Committee, ruling the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) as Responsible for Violation of the rights of Buddhist peoples and spiritual communities, Violation of the human rights to life, peace and integrity, and Violation of International Law;

CONSIDERING:

That on September 20, 2018, the International Buddhist Ethics Committee made a Manifesto on Prison Torture, demanding the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) to investigate and prosecute Crimes against humanity committed by the Argentine government and its systematic and widespread pattern of police mistreatment and abuse, arbitrary arrests and torture carried out by the Argentine security forces, which also often resort to carrying out hundreds of extrajudicial executions with total impunity;

That in such post-sentence proceedings, the IACHR was held Responsible as an Accomplice to Crimes against humanity in the event that it decides to ignore these terrible human rights violations that have been denounced not only by the International Buddhist Ethics Committee but also by organizations such as the Coordinator Against Police and Institutional Repression (Correpi) and the Office of Institutional Violence (Procuvin);

That in the same way this Decree dictates the Responsibility of the IACHR in maintaining the impunity of Crimes against humanity carried out by the Argentine State with the excuse of quarantine for the Coronavirus pandemic;

That likewise, the non-denunciation of the criminal behavior of the Argentine State conforms a systematic pattern of the IACHR, so its omission is an act of complicity, thus committing a High Crime against the intrinsic fundamental Freedoms;

That it is recognized that the death rate from Coronavirus would not be 3.4% as reported by the World Health Organization, nor would it be 1% as studies by China and Germany suggest, but rather as important scientists from Stanford University point out the true mortality would be 0.12%, as stated by epidemiologist Ioannidis and other colleagues, thus being very similar to the lethality of ordinary flu, which means that mass quarantines are one of the largest acts of collective psychosis of history as they are totally disproportionate measures with respect to the problem they seek to remedy;

That quarantines only work when a region has been infected and it is fenced so that it does not infect the rest of the national or international population, and that is why declaring quarantine for the entire population of a country is an act of absolute irrationality since no separation between the sick and the healthy ones is being made;

That most of the quarantines have been declared by governments with deplorable health systems, given that the States have preferred to invest in weapons instead of investing in health and therefore the quarantine would not be a remedy but would only be covering up the responsibility of political leaders in having a health system that overflows and causes thousands of deaths at the mere appearance of a minor disease such as the Coronavirus;

That humanity is suffering from a serious Global Panic Attack, and more than ever needing Spiritual Health or Cure (Nirvana) from the psychological suffering produced by living a life infected by the diseases of greed, hatred and deceit that make humanity to have an obsession with rumors, superficiality and the ill of social networks, spreading the virus of ignorance, fear and separateness among the people;

That in accordance with the foregoing, the Argentine government has carried out a Coup d’état, since the executive power has taken over the State and the legislative and judicial systems have ceased to function, even de facto suspending civil rights, which is totally unconstitutional and also contrary to international human rights treaties and conventions;

That the Argentine government has allowed the local administrations of hundreds of cities and provinces to irrationally, unconstitutionally and illegally block the limits of the territories and accesses to the streets or routes to prevent access by other argentine citizens, and has even allowed these rulers to illegally force people to stay in their homes, which means that they have illegally decreed a covered-up state of siege in their cities, violating human rights established in the Argentine National Constitution by restricting them with no legal grounds, since the governors and mayors do not be legally empowered to close roads or establish borders, and they would be disobeying the Argentine National Constitution where it is stated that the citizens of each province enjoy all the rights and privileges of citizenship in the others, being the same Constitution that also establishes that all citizens enjoy the right to move freely throughout the national territory, not being able to carry out restrictions without legal basis or discriminatory norms that impede circulation;

That the Argentine National Constitution allows restricting free movement only when the President requests the Congress to declare a State of siege, which has not happened so far, thus demonstrating the illegality and unconstitutionality of the actions of the Argentine government of Alberto Fernández in the face of the Coronavirus pandemic, which in no way merits to destroy constitutional protections and human rights;

That a large number of municipalities have declared their own curfews with restrictions on movement and absolute prohibitions on leaving their homes after a certain hour, taking illegal measures with complete independence from the executive, legislative and judicial powers at the national level, and dictating measures that usually impede circulation from the afternoon, which not only is an illegal measure that does not arise from any rule, but even ignores that the town mayors do not have any power to ignore constitutional guarantees and to dictate sanitary measures that are incumbent of the national government;

That a large amount of provincial governments in Argentina made illegal decisions and prohibited access to their territories, even blocking their accesses and leaving a great number of people trapped between provincial limits, as is the case of a group of climbers who, although they passed medical check-ups, they were stranded without any food and proper hygiene on an inter-provincial route after these unconstitutional restrictions were decided, and they could not access the province of Catamarca or the province of La Rioja, reason why, by not allowing them to continue or to return, and not being allowed to set up the tents to protect themselves from the pandemic of the dengue mosquito, the provincial rulers not only committed an abuse of power but also an abandonment of person and inhuman treatment that violates basic living conditions, being part of a systematic plan that is a crime against humanity;

That dozens of Argentine citizens got also trapped on a bridge between the Argentina and Brazil border in Puerto Iguazú, unable to enter either country despite being citizens, which constitutes one of the most incomprehensible and inhumane decisions of the history of the country, leaving these people in a state of illegal and infrahuman imprisonment without food or hygiene;

That, in agreement with former Argentine Ambassador Jorge Asís, who has defined the current Argentine government as a Police State even though it appears to have a good cause, since the Argentine government has decided to maintain strict control over all of society by suppressing the fundamental rights and civil liberties, deploying all the security forces for such purposes instead of using them to combat drug trafficking and organized crime, which implies that the Argentine government contradicts the Argentine National Constitution and the Human Rights Conventions, forming an Anti-democratic and anti-republican Police State;

That the group of medical experts who advise the Argentine government to continue the illegal quarantine are part of a systematic and generalized plan of human rights violations, since the rights to work have been violated by not allowing the population to go outside to earn their food, the right to freedom of movement has been violated by requiring government permits for those who want to leave their homes, the right to education has been violated by suspending school and university classes, the right to freedom of worship has been violated by not allowing churches to function, the right to assembly has been violated for not allowing friends to gather in their homes, the right to health has been violated by generating thousands of deaths as a result of canceling consultations and medical procedures related to cardiovascular diseases that are the first cause of death in the world, the right to well-being has been violated for not allowing psychology to function, the right to defense has been violated for not allowing lawyers to operate, and the right to development has been violated for not allowing the operation of hundreds of thousands of companies, 80% of which are on the verge of bankruptcy since they cannot pay the salaries of their employees, all of which is a set of incoherent and absurd measures in a country where before the Coronavirus there was already 40% poverty and which is now facing a possible social outbreak caused by the ignorance and ineffectiveness of the corrupt political caste;

That the Argentine government during the Quarantine has carried out a generalized and systematic plan of arbitrary arrests by the brutal state repressive forces, which is a crime against humanity, reaching the scandalous number of more than 3 million people arrested or charged for the sole reason of exercising their constitutional rights and freedom of movement, but not for the reason of spreading an epidemic, which would imply that in Argentina there are more quarantine violators than Coronavirus sufferers worldwide;

That the arrest of people in the context of the Coronavirus pandemic would only be a legal arrest when it is judicially proven not only that the person is infected but also that the individual has intentionally decided to spread the virus to other people;

That the Argentine government has illegally suspended the constitutional rights of citizens in a totally irrational way to create a Police State that fights against a virus with a real mortality rate very similar to the common flu, but that at the moment of fighting the true scourges that torment the population -such as drug trafficking and crime- the police system not only does not work but is even an accomplice of the criminals, while corrupt politicians get richer every day and people get poorer every day;

That the Argentine government pretends and overacts an alleged concern for the health of the people, using the Coronavirus excuse to establish an unconstitutional regime, which is demonstrable by the position that it has maintained for decades in all matters that seriously threaten health, as is the case of smoking that causes the death of more than 120 Argentine citizens per day, which is a higher number than the current number of deaths from Coronavirus in the country, and yet the Argentine government never ratified the Convention of the WHO for tobacco control nor even promoted effective measures against this global ill;

That the illegal regime in Argentina led by Alberto Fernández and Cristina Kirchner has arrested or penalized millions of innocent civilians, while at the same time in a completely irrational way has released genocidaires and even thousands of prisoners without electronic anklet bands, under the excuse that they can get Coronavirus in prison;

That the Argentine police have illegally detained defenseless civilians, including women and children, who have later been murdered and covered up the murder with impunity, as is the case of Florencia Morales who was arrested for riding a bicycle and a few hours later appeared hanged in the cell of a police station in the San Luis region, making people to believe that she had committed suicide with her shoelaces, and, moreover, just a few days later in the same region of Argentina a minor was arrested and a few hours later he appeared hanged with his own shirt at the police station;

That the Argentine police have illegally and violently detained innocent civilians for the mere fact of walking on the street, as was the case with citizen Laura Turzanski, who despite quoting constitutional articles that allowed her to walk freely and pleading that a presidential order is not above the Argentine National Constitution, however she was violently detained and the police also told her that there is no Constitution because “we are in a pandemic”;

That Article 14 of the Argentine National Constitution gives all its citizens rights to work, to trade, to enter the territory, to transit, to association, to worship and to learning, all of which have been violated by the de facto government of Alberto Fernández;

That Article 18 of the Argentine National Constitution states that no Argentine citizen may be punished without prior trial or arrest warrant issued by the competent authority, which is an inviolable constitutional right;

That the International Buddhist Ethics Committee agrees with Javier Cremades, President of the World Jurist Association, who has stated that the quarantine implies a loss of the sacred freedom of the human being, being almost a house arrest without the determination of a judge, and therefore the Coronavirus pandemic cannot be an alibi for the governmental Power to prevail over the rights of citizens, since health protection must be carried out with measures in accordance with the Constitution and never by violating it, for public action must always respect the dignity of people;

That quarantines are unconstitutional and inefficient mechanisms to protect people’s health, since they generate economic crises and the loss of millions of jobs, with which millions of people enter poverty and misery, having worse food and worse integral health, such as the increase in deaths from cardiovascular diseases, malnutrition and homicides, making it an act of ignorance or absolute irrationality the fact that President Fernández declares that he prioritizes health over the economy when actually both elements are interdependent;

That carrying out a quarantine for the entire population -in a country that already has 40% poverty- constitutes practically an economic disaster and a kind of death sentence, which is why many specialists have affirmed that it would be wiser that only mass entertainment shows are closed and that adults over 65 be at home, while they constitute 93% of those dead by Coronavirus, which would allow a large part of the population to return to work and to education, since their lives are not in danger, in addition that this would not cause the health system to overflow;

That carrying out a quarantine only for the population over 65 years of age should not be mandatory but an optional quarantine, in which the State would provide resources and protection to those who wish to seclude themselves in their homes, otherwise a discriminatory and segregative system that it is unconstitutional would be created, in addition to the fact that a large number of elderly people would rather prefer to risk becoming infected and dying than living inhumanly and sedentary in home prison;

That the governments of the world are taking advantage of the Coronavirus crisis to establish an authoritarian regime of illegal surveillance that violates the right to privacy, beginning to destroy the republican principles and respect for fundamental rights and individual liberties, because the ones who have to decide how to live in the face of the pandemic are the people themselves and not the politicians;

That the Argentine political regime is returning to the worst of the past, which was precisely when the military dictatorships suspended constitutional rights and established an Authoritarian Police State of crimes against humanity;

Therefore, it is hereby DECREED:

ARTICLE 1.- A new extension of the Judgment against the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights must be approved in order to rectify its behavior and ethically sanction it to fulfill its functions, by declaring it an Accomplice in Crimes against Humanity and High Crimes against Intrinsic Fundamental Freedoms.

ARTICLE 2.- The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights must be reproved for failing to investigate or to promote the trial against the human rights violations involved in the Quarantine system, especially the Argentine Case and its systematic and widespread arbitrary arrests that violate the Argentine National Constitution and the American Convention of Human Rights.

ARTICLE 3.- The Vatican State and Pope Francis I must be ordered to stop imaginatively accusing those countries that do not promote quarantines for supposedly performing a “viral genocide”, which is a position that only contributes to the true pandemic of fear and ignorance, pressing governments to take unconstitutional measures like those that occurred in Argentina.

ARTICLE 4.- The International Criminal Court (ICC) should be invited to investigate and prosecute crimes against humanity committed with impunity by the Argentine government of Presidents Cristina Kirchner, Mauricio Macri and Alberto Fernández.

ARTICLE 5.- It must be confirmed the fact that those Latin American countries that have supported criminal quarantines have copied the authoritarian and undemocratic system of government in China that has historically violated the human rights of its entire population.

ARTICLE 6.- Ethical and solidarity support to citizens around the world who seek to free themselves from illegal and dictatorial quarantines must be communicated, inciting them to raise the flag of Liberty, Equality and Fraternity to infringe unconstitutional, excessive, unjust and unworthy laws that violate their human rights and intrinsic freedoms, which means a peaceful and democratic call to Planetary Civil Disobedience.

ARTICLE 7.- It must be recalled the fact that Liberty is not only a constitutional right but is also the dharmic or spiritual nature of the human being, being his or her existential Purpose that can never be abolished or suspended by any government.

Always with spirit of reconciliation (maitri),

H.E. Master Maitreya Samyaksambuddha

President and Judge of the International Buddhist Ethics Committee

 

 

 

 

Freedom from Lockdown

Freedom from Lockdown

By Master Maitreya Samyaksambuddha

April 12, 2020

 

The Saviors and Awakened Beings

Are not defeated by the experience of fear, but are driven by the hope of a better world;

They do not comply with the law of isolation, but are guided by the law of love;

They are not carried away by the spreading of global panic, but they propagate their presence of equanimity;

They are not trying to eliminate the inevitable diseases of life, but to improve health;

They do not avoid death, but fully fulfill the Purpose of life.

 

The Saviors and Awakened Beings

Teach to be in contact with the Truth;

Faced with the international transmission of the viruses of greed, aversion and unconsciousness,

It is only necessary to be serene for a few seconds, open the window, listen to the birds singing, and feel the sunlight.

 

When peoples become massively infected with the virus of attachment, hatred and deceit,

It is only necessary to follow the steps of the Saviors and Awakened Beings,

Whose minds are empty of the illusions of social media,

Whose hearts are full of altruism towards the neighbor.

 

When governments try to limit human rights and try to lockdown fundamental freedoms,

The Saviors and Awakened Beings are prepared to break such oppressive orders,

Being the very embodiment of the path of Love and Justice;

Transmitting reflection and rationality in times of impulsiveness and madness.

 

Humanity must learn to listen to the guidance of spiritual teachers,

The Saviors and Awakened Beings,

Instead of hearing the words of fear and panic from corrupt politicians and tyrants,

Since only Liberation will lead the human being to a better world.

 

Humanity must make the decision on whether it wants to survive or not,

But if the human being continues to hear the irrational words of the blind who think that 1% equals 100%,

Then there will be no possible future, but only fear, panic and oppression;

The world of tomorrow can only be built by living freely in the here and now, always being guided by the Love and Justice of the Saviors and Awakened Beings.

Notification on Asia Bibi

CASE 42-2018: Supreme Court of Pakistan

Notification on Asia Bibi

1 November 2018

The Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights confirms that the Supreme Court of Pakistan has released the young Christian Asia Bibi, who spent a decade in prison and had been sentenced to death on the charge of blasphemy. This acquittal occurred months after the order made by the Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights, which on January 23, 2018 had ordered her immediate release.

However, the Supreme Court of Pakistan has not complied with the order to declare the criminal law that punishes blasphemy unconstitutional and which is contrary to all human rights conventions signed by Pakistan. This reluctance to annul an inhumane law that violates the right to life, religious freedom and freedom of thought, demonstrates that the Supreme Court of Pakistan continues to actively participate in the Crimes against Humanity for which it was sentenced by the Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights on April 25, 2018, for giving impunity to those who committed serious human rights violations, such as Arbitrary Detentions, Enforced Disappearances, Torture and Extrajudicial Executions, Violation of Women’s Rights and War Crimes.

Finally, the Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights warns that the rights of more than 20 million poor children, mostly women, who do not have access to education due to lack of government investment, are being violated. This is equivalent to sentencing Pakistan’s future generations to ignorance.

With spirit of reconciliation (maitri),

Maestro Maitreya Samyaksambuddha

President and Judge of the del International Buddhist Ethics Committee (IBEC) & Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights (BTHR)

 

 

 

 

NOTIFICATION on the CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY and the CORONAVIRUS

Case 36-2017: Catholic Archdiocese of Yangon (Myanmar) & Cardinal Charles Maung Bo

5 April 2020

NOTIFICATION on the CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY and the CORONAVIRUS

The Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights has received the news that in April 2020 Cardinal Charles Maung Bo publicly stated that the Chinese Regime is morally guilty of the global expansion of the Coronavirus COVID19 that caused thousands of deaths, by accusing it not only of endangering millions of lives around the world but also of repressing religious freedom by destroying thousands of churches and crosses and imprisoning a million Muslims in concentration camps.

In the first place, while the Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights applauds all criticism in defense of spiritual communities that are illegally oppressed in China, Cardinal Charles Maung Bo‘s accusation is however considered to be malicious or biased, as the Chinese Communist Party has been as negligent in handling the pandemic as all the governments of the world, which continued to allow international flights and did not close their borders even after China decreed what until then was the largest quarantine in the history of humanity. In this sense, all the governments of the world have been negligent and not just one of them. For this reason, the Buddhist Law corrects James Kraska for saying that China is legally responsible for the Coronavirus, since ultimately most of the governments of the world are also legally responsible for not having taken adequate measures to prevent and treat the epidemic. The Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights concludes that, unless it is proven the fact that the Coronavirus was artificially created by China, this government cannot be held legally responsible for the existence and spread of the virus, whose main responsibility should then be assigned to Nature, since viruses and bacteria play a fundamental role in the body of Mother Earth.

Secondly, the fact that the Coronavirus is causing thousands of deaths every day at a global level is not because of the Chinese government, but rather it is a product of the fact that all governments have decided to invest billions of dollars annually in armaments instead of investing in social justice, education, science and health, because if all the military budgets had been redirected to medical research, to health service and the production of vaccines, then no country would be overwhelmed by the appearance of this kind of disease. For this reason, when Cardinal Charles Maung Bo declared that the Chinese Regime is the main Responsible for the damage caused by the Coronavirus to thousands of lives around the world, the Cardinal would be incurring a falsehood, this being the reason why the Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights is forced to clarify China’s innocence in this matter.

Third, the Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights has no sympathy or support whatsoever toward the Chinese Communist Party, but it is clarified that Cardinal Charles Maung Bo is maliciously mistaken in saying that those solely responsible for the Coronavirus are repression, lies and corruption of the Chinese Communist Party. Even if the Chinese authorities concealed the news and silenced doctors, disappeared journalists and misrepresented the death toll, it did not cause the Coronavirus. In a globalized world, any public health expert knows that, whatever is done, a highly contagious virus will quickly and inevitably become an international disease.

Fourth, the Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights confirms that the Chinese Communist Party‘s accusation that the United States was the cause of the Coronavirus pandemic demonstrates the same degree of malicious attitude as that one of Cardinal Charles Maung Bo.

Fifth, the Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights has evidence that a systematic and widespread system of human rights violations has existed in China for decades, with millions of forced abortions, extrajudicial detentions and executions of thousands of people, especially attacking and destroying the Buddhist, Christian and Muslim Communities. However, it is malicious to claim that this is the cause of the Coronavirus, as Cardinal Maung Bo claimed. Furthermore, despite being fully aware of these human rights violations in China, the Vatican signed a secret agreement in 2018 with the Chinese Communist Party, allowing the latter to control the Catholic religion, which leaves totally unprotect the Christian communities in China that were persecuted and kept in hiding without being controlled by the regime, this being the reason why the brave Cardinal Joseph Zen, declared that the Vatican had sold and betrayed the Chinese Christian community. The signing of this secret agreement between China and the Vatican was confirmed a few months after Pope Francis I supported the genocidal regime in Myanmar, which is China’s economic partner.

Sixth, the Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights confirms that when Cardinal Charles Maung Bo affirmed that the Chinese Communist Party is a threat to the world for being criminally responsible for the Coronavirus pandemic is a totally malicious statement. The Buddhist Law confirms that nature has caused the Coronavirus, and the human rights violations are not its cause. Furthermore, the maximum proof of Cardinal Charles Maung Bo‘s bad intention is his request for the Chinese government to apologize and make financial compensation for the debt of other countries, surely requesting this because the Cardinal is a fervent nationalist who supports the genocidal government of Myanmar (an economic partner of China).

Seventh, the Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights confirms the fact that in the past Cardinal Charles Maung Bo has been sentenced Responsible for Complicity with Genocide, Ethnic Cleansing and Crimes against humanity; Complicity with Crimes against peace; Spiritual Fraud; Complicity with Dictatorship; and Complicity with Violations of fundamental freedoms. These charges were a consequence from his public support for the Myanmar government during the Genocide against the Rohingya People. In this sense, the Buddhist Law concludes that the real threat to the world is not the Chinese Communist Party but the false prophets; those who have been denounced by the Master Jesus as ravenous wolves disguised as sheep (Matthew 7:15), the religious leaders who perversely do evil in the name of Good.

 

By Master Maitreya Samyaksambuddha

Judge of the Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights

MD in Yoga and Ayurveda Medicine

PROGRAM

 

First Semester

Module 1. Yama Yoga

Module 2. Niyama Yoga

Module 3. Asana Yoga

Module 4. Pranayama Yoga

Module 5. Pratyahara Yoga

Module 6. Dharana Yoga

Module 7. Dhyana Yoga

Module 8. Samadhi Yoga

Module 9. Prajña Yoga

Module 10. Moksha Yoga

Module 11. Santi Yoga

Module 12. Dharma Yoga

Module 13. Sasana Yoga

 

Second Semester

Module 1. Yoga Philosophy

Module 2. Tibetan Yoga

Module 3. Kundalini

Module 4. Oriental Medicine

Module 5. Tai chi chuan

Module 6. Yoga Therapy

Module 7. Yoga Psychology

Module 8. Pilates

Module 9. Ayurveda

Module 10. Acupuncture

Module 11. Chinese Medicine

Module 12. Holistic Medicine

 

Third Semester

Module 1: Introduction to Buddhist Medicine

Module 2: Integral Holistic Medicine

Module 3: Tibetan Medicine

Module 4: Chinese Medicine

Module 5: Oriental Medical Diagnosis

Module 6: Ayurvedic Medicine

Module 7: Yogi Medicine of Breathing

Module 8: Yoga Therapy

Module 9: Tibetan Yoga

Module 10: Integral Yoga

Module 11: Meditative Healing

Module 12: Taoist Medicine

 

Fourth Semester

Module 1: Acupuncture

Module 2: Phytotherapy and Medicinal Herbs

Module 3: Natural Medicine and Naturopathy

Module 4: Indigenous Medicine

Module 5: Thai Massage and Digitopuncture

Module 6: Qi Gong and Tai Chi

Module 7: Vibrational Medicine and Music Therapy

Module 8: Reiki Therapy

Module 9: Iridology, Reflexotherapy and Auriculotherapy

Module 10: Homeopathy

Module 11: Floral Therapy and Aromatherapy

Module 12: Anthroposophic Medicine

 

 

 

Notification to Indian Bank

Case 53-2020: Nagarjuna Training Institute   

 

NOTIFICATION TO THE INDIAN BANK & STATE BANK OF INDIA

 

On February 12, 2020, it is confirmed that the communications made by the individual named Dhammachari Vivekratna with the Indian Bank (June 20, 2019) and with the State Bank of India (November 6, 2019) have been studied. In both communications it was requested to cease the economic transfers of the “Vishuddhaloka Welfare Association” by alleging supposed illegal acts carried out by the board members of the organization, and furthermore the individual called Vivekratna stated that he was the true President of the institution. In addition, in the same communications Vivekratna stated that a “disciplinary committee” was going to be carried out in order to evaluate the bad behavior of the members.

During this case the International Buddhist Ethics Committee confirms that it played the role as a disciplinary committee to evaluate the legal case presented by the Visuddhaloka Welfare Association, and that the following determinations have been taken:

 

  • Vivekratna and his colleagues have not presented any evidence on the alleged illegal acts of the members of Visuddhaloka Welfare Association.
  • Vivekratna is not the legitimate President of Visuddhaloka Welfare Association, so he would have attempted to illegally appropriate the organization.
  • Vivekratna has no legitimacy to request blocking of the economic funds, as this could only be required by a competent judge.

 

Always with spirit of reconciliation (maitri),

 

Judge Maitreya Samyaksambuddha

 

International Buddhist Ethics Committee

Case 53: Nagarjuna Training Institute

Case 53-2020: Nagarjuna Training Institute (NTI) & Dh. Lokamitra  & Dh. Vivekratna

The International Buddhist Ethics Committee finds them RESPONSIBLE of the charges:

  • Corruption
  • Scam and Illegal appropriation
  • Illicit Association or Organized Crime
  • Defamation
  • Buddhist Ethics Violation

 

Evidences of the Nagarjuna Training Institute Case

Judgment on Nagarjuna Training Institute

Notification to Indian Bank

 

 

 

Judgment on Nagarjuna Training Institute

 

Case 53-2020: Nagarjuna Training Institute (NTI) & Dh. Lokamitra  & Dh. Vivekratna

ETHICAL JUDGMENT

Dear Prosecutor, Ambassador and Members of the Jury of the International Buddhist Ethics Committee (IBEC) & Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights (BTHR), regarding Case 53-2020 on “Nagarjuna Training Institute (NTI) & Dh. Lokamitra & Dh. Vivekratna”, on February 11, 2020, it is hereby recorded that the trial to analyze the violation of Buddhist Ethics carried out by the accused has been concluded. This Case has been carried out as a result of the complaint made by Visuddhaloka Welfare Association, a member institution of the United Buddhist Nations Organization.

After analyzing the presentation of the Case and the validation of evidence, the Committee has proceeded with voting of four members of the Jury, confirming that there was 1 vote considering the accused as Innocent and 3 votes considering “Nagarjuna Training Institute (NTI) & Dh . Lokamitra & Dh. Vivekratna” as “Responsible” for the serious crimes of Corruption, Scam and Illegal appropriation, Illicit Association or Organized Crime, Defamation and Violation of Buddhist Law.

The International Buddhist Ethics Committee has been able to verify that “Nagarjuna Training Institute (NTI) & Dh. Lokamitra & Dh. Vivekratna” have Violated the Buddhist Law by trying to appropriate something that does not belong to them: the Visuddhaloka Welfare Association. This illegal action was carried out in order to recover the economic funds that they had donated in the past. This suggests that the accused ones are considered themselves as shareholders and not as donors. In addition, the accused have submitted no evidence against the Visuddhaloka Welfare Association, and therefore their accusations constitute Defamation acts. The accused party was given the opportunity to present evidence yet they decided not to, despite the fact that such evidence would have demonstrated not only the Innocence of “Nagarjuna Training Institute (NTI) & Dh. Lokamitra & Dh. Vivekratna” but it would also have definitely shown that Visuddhaloka Welfare Association is corrupt. However, this has not happened. The fact that they try to recover the economic funds donated in the past, by trying to expropriate the Visuddhaloka institution, constitutes an illegitimate means of resolving the matter, since rather they should have resorted to a third party playing the role as a mediator or judge (whether state or private), as is the case with the Ethics Committee. In this regard, Visuddhaloka Welfare Association requested the intermediation of the International Buddhist Ethics Committee, and even challenged the directors of Nagarjuna Training Institute to present evidence of their accusations. This legal challenge was not responded by the defendants, who have behaved illegally when carrying out their claims.

The International Buddhist Ethics Committee makes clear the fact that Visuddhaloka Welfare Association has not been judged, since no evidence was presented against this institution, but the case has been against the misbehavior of Nagarjuna Training Institute & Dh. Lokamitra & Dh. Vivekratna, who have tried to resolve conflicts through inappropriate means. In this way, if the accused would have good intentions, they would not only present evidence supporting their allegations, but would have even sued the Visuddhaloka Welfare Association, seeking to legally recover the donated funds, instead of attempting to illegally appropriate the institution. This kind of behavior that violates Buddhist Law cannot be tolerated. A clear allegory of this type of attitude can be clarified with the following example: if a person is supposedly robbed by a criminal, this does not grant him any right to go to the house of the alleged criminal and appropriate criminal´s things, but the individual must appeal to justice in order to resolve the conflict in a peaceful, legal and non-violent way.

The International Buddhist Ethics Committee also makes clear that the accused Nagarjuna Training Institute & Dh. Lokamitra & Dh. Vivekratna not only did not answer to the Ethics Committee and did not present any defense or evidence against Visuddhaloka during the Ethical Trial, but they also behaved in a manner that is contrary to Ethics when communicating by phone with a member of the jury of the International Buddhist Ethics Committee, who then voted for the Innocence of the accused party. Although this vote has not been annulled, this kind of precedents will not be tolerated by International Buddhist Law, since they constitute aggravated behavior by the accused, who instead of clarifying a formal defense tried to hinder the deliberations of the Ethics Committee. Therefore, it is declared that any communication by an accused made to a jury member is prohibited during the ethical trial.

In conclusion, the International Buddhist Ethics Committee has the Purpose (Dharma) to protect the integrity of the International Spiritual Commune (Maha-Sangha), developing an advanced ethics that teaches to behave according to the highest standards, both for individuals and for Buddhist institutions. Thus, the Maitriyana movement will never endorse that a Buddhist institution violates the integrity of other institutions through uses contrary to Buddhist Law and Ethics.

The International Buddhist Ethics Committee oversees that members of the World Sangha do not attempt against ethics, human rights and Buddhist teachings, for which reason “Nagarjuna Training Institute & Dh. Lokamitra & Dh. Vivekratna” has been sentenced Responsible for Corruption, Scam and Illegal appropriation, Illicit Association or Organized Crime, Defamation and Violation of Buddhist Law.

With spirit of reconciliation (maitri),

Master Maitreya Samyaksambuddha

President and Judge of the International Buddhist Ethics Committee

 

 

 

 

 

USA-Iran Agreement

January 2020

The Supreme Council of World Peace communicates with the governments of the United States and Iran with the aim of requiring the total detention of all types of economic, cultural or arms warfare between both sides of the conflict, confirming that both countries have recently committed acts of State Terrorism. For its part, Iran has supported terrorist groups in the Middle East while committing crimes against humanity against its own population; while the United States has resorted to extrajudicial killing of civilians whom it considered its enemies, executing them without the existence of any kind of trial, such as the cases of Osama Bin Laden and Qasem Soleimani.

The behavior of both countries is an affront against World Peace, so it is formally required that they abandon all kinds of violent resources and that they resolve their differences before the International Court of Justice, thus complying with the Charter of the United Nations.

The Supreme Council of World Peace offers itself to act as a mediator in the conflict between the United States and Iran in case both countries require it in order to establish a process of peaceful and juridical resolution of conflicts.

Always with reconciling spirit,

President H.E. Maitreya Samyaksambuddha

 

https://worldpeacesupremecouncil.wordpress.com/

worldpeacesupremecouncil@gmail.com