Case 11-2016: Unesco Association for the Promotion of Intercultural and Interreligious Dialogue in Malaga
The International Buddhist Ethics Committee finds them RESPONSIBLE of the charges:
– Complicity with Discrimination
– False Intercultural Dialogue
– False Interreligious Dialogue FALSE INTERRELIGIOUS DIALOGUE
– Complicity with Discrimination
– False Intercultural Dialogue
– False Interreligious Dialogue FALSE INTERRELIGIOUS DIALOGUE
Evidences of Case of UNESCO Association in Malaga
Maitriyana Buddhist Community 